Do we need a novel framework for classifying psychopathology? A discussion paper

Journal article

W. Rief, S. G. Hofmann, M. Berg, Forbes M. K., D. A. Pizzagalli, J. Zimmermann, E. Fried, G. M. Reed
Clinical Psychology in Europe (CPE), vol. 5(4), 2023, pp. e11699–e11699

DOI: 10.32872/CPE.11699

DOI PubMed

Cite

APA Click to copy
Rief, W., Hofmann, S. G., Berg, M., K., F. M., Pizzagalli, D. A., Zimmermann, J., … Reed, G. M. (2023). Do we need a novel framework for classifying psychopathology? A discussion paper. Clinical Psychology in Europe (CPE), 5(4), e11699–e11699. https://doi.org/10.32872/CPE.11699

Chicago/Turabian Click to copy
Rief, W., S. G. Hofmann, M. Berg, Forbes M. K., D. A. Pizzagalli, J. Zimmermann, E. Fried, and G. M. Reed. “Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion Paper.” Clinical Psychology in Europe (CPE) 5, no. 4 (2023): e11699–e11699.

MLA Click to copy
Rief, W., et al. “Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion Paper.” Clinical Psychology in Europe (CPE), vol. 5, no. 4, 2023, pp. e11699–e11699, doi:10.32872/CPE.11699.

BibTeX Click to copy

@article{rief2023a,
  title = {Do we need a novel framework for classifying psychopathology? A discussion paper},
  year = {2023},
  issue = {4},
  journal = {Clinical Psychology in Europe (CPE)},
  pages = {e11699–e11699},
  volume = {5},
  doi = {10.32872/CPE.11699},
  author = {Rief, W. and Hofmann, S. G. and Berg, M. and K., Forbes M. and Pizzagalli, D. A. and Zimmermann, J. and Fried, E. and Reed, G. M.}
}

Introduction: The ICD-11 and DSM-5 are the leading systems for the classification of mental disorders, and their relevance for clinical work and research, as well as their impact for policy making and legal questions, has increased considerably. In recent years, other frameworks have been proposed to supplement or even replace the ICD and the DSM, raising many questions regarding clinical utility, scientific relevance, and, at the core, how best to conceptualize mental disorders.
Method: As examples of the new approaches that have emerged, here we introduce the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), systems and network approaches, process-based approaches, as well as a new approach to the classification of personality disorders.
Results and Discussion: We highlight main distinctions between these classification frameworks, largely related to different priorities and goals, and discuss areas of overlap and potential compatibility. Synergies among these systems may provide promising new avenues for research and clinical practice.

Do we need a novel framework for classifying psychopathology? A discussion paper

Journal article

Cite

Follow this website