APA
Click to copy
Neal, Z. P., Forbes, M., Neal, J., Brusco, M., Krueger, R., Markon, K., … Wright, A. G. C. (2022). Critiques of network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00177-9
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Neal, Z. P., M. Forbes, J. Neal, M. Brusco, R. Krueger, K. Markon, D. Steinley, S. Wasserman, and A. G. C. Wright. “Critiques of Network Analysis of Multivariate Data in Psychological Science.” Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2, no. 1 (2022): 90.
MLA
Click to copy
Neal, Z. P., et al. “Critiques of Network Analysis of Multivariate Data in Psychological Science.” Nature Reviews Methods Primers, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, p. 90, doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00177-9.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{z2022a,
title = {Critiques of network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science},
year = {2022},
issue = {1},
journal = {Nature Reviews Methods Primers},
pages = {90},
volume = {2},
doi = {10.1038/s43586-022-00177-9},
author = {Neal, Z. P. and Forbes, M. and Neal, J. and Brusco, M. and Krueger, R. and Markon, K. and Steinley, D. and Wasserman, S. and Wright, A. G. C.}
}
Using network methods to analyze multivariate psychological data on symptoms or beliefs has become popular, and numerous tutorials and primers provide detailed guides. However, these guides make such methods appear artificially robust because they often fail to adequately review serious critiques of psychometric network analysis. We briefly review critiques concerning model selection, study design, estimation reliability, and interpretation of measures, and provide a comprehensive annotated bibliography of published critiques.
